As spiritualists should we stop trying to prove life
exists post Mortem?
I believe totally (as a spiritualist Medium) that life exists after death, and have spent the past 18 years developing myself to get to a level where I can prove this fact
In my experience the world is divided on religion completely and the diversity in all religions is phenomenal. However Spiritualism is more about proof rather than faith.
I do respect all religions entirely, but have never felt comfortable with the politics of most.
Spiritualism and my belief in the afterlife has helped me immensely after suffering the loss of my beloved father who, even now, I miss so much, and through my development with various tutors and Students alike (you don’t have to be brilliant to teach someone about their subject) I have found comfort in the fact that he is always with me.
Now back to this Proof thing. let’s look at Proof, and what does it mean
[mass noun] evidence or argument establishing a fact or the truth of a statement: (Oxford English Dictionary)
When you try to prove something there will always be someone who will disbelieve ALWAYS!! If you have ever been unfortunate to be in court, or even watched a court case on TV, there will be someone given their version of event, which will be absolutely accurate according to the person giving it, and they will fully believe in what they are saying.
However the defence lawyers or prosecutors will rip it to pieces and turn it around completely. Because they are sceptical, and it is there job to do this.
The same is for some sceptics and I say some, because it doesn’t apply to all.
A sceptic will have their reasons for not believing, and will always find a reason to not believe, or a logical explanation to disprove what has just been said. Sometimes entering in to a blind rage without even listening to the full facts, or the Proof that is being given.
How can we change this?
We can’t now and never will. A sceptic who wants to be a sceptic will always be a sceptic.
As a Medium the first thing I would say about myself is I am an extremely sensitive. It is one of the qualifications for the role.
A Medium is sensitive, passionate, and take their beliefs and spirituality very seriously.
There comes the issue.
They can give evidence on a stage a podium, on Facebook, in a one to one, which can be irrefutable proof that they are communicating with the person that has left this physical life, only to be called a fraud, a con, a charlottane etc etc.
In my opinion, I think that we should stop trying to prove Life after death. Stop continually putting ourselves in a courtroom every time we stand and represent the spirit world, don’t allow the sceptic to rip in to our beliefs and our passions that we have trained so hard for.
People of the world; Believe it or Don’t believe it.
Mediums; don’t look for the proof, look for the person from the spirit world, look at their passions, their personality, allow their energy to come close. Be a part of them; let them be a part of you. Take on their persona, let the earth bound loved ones feel the presence of spirit.
Represent the spirit world as a friend, not as there Lawyer. Develop and attune yourself to such a level that you bring the essence of that person to embrace your sitter, let them feel the presence of spirit.
In my experience if you can bring about the very essence, the personality, emotion and passion of your communicator, then the (so-called) proof will present itself much much more that you could imagine if you were just aware of spirit.
Many mediums restrict themselves to one sense, WHY? This is mental mediumship, and as such the only limits we have is what we place on ourselves.
So In Deliberation Milord/Milady, I put it to you, that I shall no longer be presenting the evidence, or try to prove that your loved one, is or isn’t still alive.
I will give you your loved one Warts and all
Pete Jackson
